|
Post by been_there on Oct 31, 2021 12:37:39 GMT
Here is an example of how current attitudes will have to change — and need to be seen to be changing — regarding how history in schools is to be taught to children, if laws are to be applied consistently.
That change is needed is demonstrated by a current controversy concerning an example given by a school administrator regarding the application of a new House Bill in the state of Texas. The Bill requires school libraries and teachers to make available books offering opposing views on historical subjects. Here is what the Bill states:
Gina Peddy is the executive director of curriculum and instruction for the district who is at the centre of the story. She created a huge controversy after she was recorded giving an example of a historic event that would require a teacher to keep on hand other books with "opposing" views.
Gina Peddy chose to use ‘the Holocaust’ as an example of a historic event requiring a teacher to make available "opposing" views.
She is recorded as telling the teachers this:
You can hear the recording of her statement here:
________
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Oct 31, 2021 12:46:10 GMT
That attitudes ARE changing is demonstrated by this article, discussing the above Gina Peddy controversy and the people claiming to be upset by her choice of example. Why not question “the Holocaust” in schools? The standard narrative does not stand up to serious historical scrutiny
By PHILIP GIRALDI • OCTOBER 26, 2021 www.unz.com/pgiraldi/why-not-question-the-holocaust-in-schools/Republican state Senator Bryan Hughes, who wrote the bill that became the law, denied that anyone should come up with alternative views on what he called matters of “good and evil” or to remove books that offer only one perspective on the Holocaust. Jews in Peddy’s school district and elsewhere in both Texas and nationally have inevitably also risen to the bait, denouncing any attempt made to challenge what they view as an issue fundamental to their understanding of their place in the world and in history. One Jewish former student Jake Berman asserted that “The facts are that there are not two sides of the Holocaust. The Nazis systematically killed millions of people.” Ledbetter, Robison and Hughes should perhaps consider that they are suggesting that their new law should only apply on “controversial” racial issues, not on other historical developments and it is curious that educated people should consider a multi-faceted transnational historical event that has inter alia a highly politicized context a “fact.” The holocaust narrative in and of itself is the creation of men and women after the fact with an agenda to justify the creation and support for the State of Israel and should be subject to the same inquiry as any other facet of the Second World War and what came after. The tale of “the holocaust” is essentially a contrived bit of history that serves a political objective wrapped up in what purports to be a powerful statement regarding man’s inhumanity to man. Jewish groups generally speaking consider the standard narrative with its highly questionable six million dead, gas chambers, extermination camps, and soap made from body fat to be something like sacred ground, with its memorialization of the uniqueness of Jewish suffering. Serious scholars who have actually looked at the narrative and the numbers and sequences of events are not surprisingly skeptical of many of the details. As a first step, it is helpful to look at controversial Professor Norman Finkelstein’s carefully documented book The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. Finkelstein, to be sure, believes there was something like a genocide of European Jews and even lost some family members due to it. He does not, however, necessarily believe many of the details provided by the standard narrative and official promoters of that story to include the numerous holocaust museums. In his view, powerful interests have hijacked “the Holocaust,” and use it to further their own objectives. He wrote “Organized Jewry has exploited the Nazi holocaust to deflect criticism of Israel’s and its own indefensible policies. Nazi genocide has been used to justify criminal policies of the Israeli state and US support for these policies.” And there is also a money angle, as there often is. Per Finkelstein, Jewish organizations in the US have also exploited the situation of the dwindling number of aging holocaust survivors to extort “staggering sums of money from the rest of the world. This is not done not for the benefit of needy survivors but for the financial advantage of these organizations.” As taking courses in the holocaust are mandated in the public school systems of twenty states (and soon to be more due to pressure from local Jewish groups) and is used to validate the billions of US taxpayer dollars given annually to the state of Israel it would seem that supporters of the narrative should have the confidence as well as sufficient integrity to defend their product. But that is, of course, not the case. They would prefer to have their chosen narrative unchallenged, raising the usual claims of anti-Semitism and “holocaust denial” to silence critics. One of the “textbooks” frequently used in public schools that mandate holocaust education is Night by Elie Wiesel, whom Finkelstein has dubbed “the high huckster of the holocaust.” Night claims to be autobiographical but is full of errors in time and place. It is at least in part a work of fiction. Similarly, the ‘ Diary of Anne Frank’ was published after editing by her survivor father and parts of it have been challenged. As a general rule, contentious issues where advocates attempt to silence opponents by claiming that what they are promoting is based on fact and cannot be challenged should be challenged. In Europe, powerful Jewish constituencies have even made it illegal to criticize or deny the holocaust narrative. In America, that day may soon be coming as Jewish groups increasingly seek to criminalize questioning of the factual basis of the holocaust as well as any criticism of Israel.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Nov 4, 2021 10:42:38 GMT
Here is another sign of changing attitudes. It is somebody questioning the official narrative regarding Dr. Josef Mengele on Quora. Most of the replies are from people who believe and repeat the usual non-credible nonsense. But there are a few who reply more intelligently. Plus their replies receive ‘likes’. AND they haven’t been deleted!!! 😮 Here is the question: Was Josef Mengele really as bad as people say he was?And here are some of the replies from people who appear to have seen through the highly improbable and unlikely official narrative: i.postimg.cc/kgtcNfyH/E36-E11-B7-AAAF-4-D2-C-B0-F2-B860-A1529-B0-A.jpg
|
|
|
Post by mrolonzo on Nov 5, 2021 22:29:17 GMT
I can just imagine the seething on quora at these answers.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Nov 13, 2021 16:46:18 GMT
Here is a Jewish women actively promoting what Prof. Norman Finkelstein called ‘the holocaust industry’.
She is promoting the sale of books on the subject including works of fiction.
But although she refers to what she psychologcally tries to reinforce as “the truth of the holocaust”, she inadvertently confirms that increasing numbers of people either don’t accept that it is the whole ‘truth’, or don’t care either way.
According to Rachel, people who were alive in Europe during WW2 and were Jewish and are still alive now, so who were children or infants — STILL live with and experience the effects of that historical narrative “every day”. 😮🙄
And here is a Jewish newspaper conceding that there is an “increasing” realisation that the H-story can not withstand intelligent scrutiny and is worthy of ridicule:
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Nov 14, 2021 12:55:09 GMT
The following article contains a blatant contradiction: it complains of the lack of diversity in history education. But then applauds and details state legislation that enforces only one version of history by protecting a particular WW2 narrative from analysis and revision!! 🙄
But one thing that the article inadvertently acknowledges is the INCREASING numbers of people seeing through the hypocrisy and indoctrination / historical brain-washing.
That reality of increasing awareness of the misinformation is then misrepresented in two ways: 1.) by equating the realisation of the amount of “exaggeration” in the narrative as “denial” of the narrative as a whole. 2.) by equating realisation of the degree of misrepresentation as somehow being ‘anti-semitic’?!?! 🤔🤪
BOTTOM LINE: the article admits that increasing numbers of people are becoming aware of this deception and misrepresentation.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Dec 6, 2021 16:44:33 GMT
———————————————————————
Here is an article showing how reasonable, critical skepticism of the compulsory, legally-protected, anti-German ‘mass-murder-by-gas’ hate-trope known as ‘THE holocaust’ is increasing and reaching a wider readership.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Dec 27, 2021 8:23:30 GMT
Here is how Israel’s holocaust propaganda museum Yad Vashem, was described by holocaust researcher Daniel Blatman:
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Dec 27, 2021 13:35:12 GMT
Here is how Israel’s holocaust propaganda museum Yad Vashem, was described by holocaust researcher Daniel Blatman: Here is more from the same article, that appeared in the Jewish Israeli newspaper Haaretz three years ago.
Despite that fact it is written by a professional holyco$t-industry promoter, who thinks he is permitted to spread hatred-generating, libelous accusations of racism against anyone and everyone because he is Jewish, it is interesting because it discusses the changing attitudes to what is called ”holocaust history”. It also shows how Jews — especially racist, Israeli Jews — don’t get an automatic ’free pass’ anymore when they play ‘the holocaust’ and/or ‘poor us’ eternal-victim card.
|
|
|
Post by Turnagain on Dec 27, 2021 14:02:19 GMT
Geez, the Jews seem to now be admitting that while their holyhoax is the primary event of WW II, the rest of the millions who suffered and died in the war can at least be mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Dec 29, 2021 14:11:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Dec 31, 2021 7:47:34 GMT
Here is a speech made by some high-up person in a holocaust-promoting organisation admitting that skepticism and doubt about the historical accuracy of the Holocaust narrative is INCREASING! The article is illustrated with the following photo of the man on their stage who I exposed lying to children and their parents plus making claims he himself is the living proof against.
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Jan 1, 2022 12:32:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by been_there on Jan 15, 2022 10:43:57 GMT
Here is further evidence that the public’s understanding of the ‘h’-narrative is changing. And the change is towards increasing awareness that ‘the holocaust’ as history is deeply flawed and innaccurate. Here is an admission — in this case by Jewish organisations dedicated to promoting a particular version of WW2 history — that ‘holocaust revisionism’ is gaining adherents. And to combat this increase in factual awareness of the actual empirical and historical evidence regarding the Jewish experience during WW2, these Jewish organisations are increasing their programmes to indoctrinate impressionable school children with their legally-protected version. They presumably are working on the principal that humans have difficulty correcting beliefs that they have accepted when young. The principal that Mark Twain referred to when he wrote: “it is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled”.
At a ceremony inaugurating the indoctrination programme, it was explained WHY it is thought necessary to force a flawed, innaccurate, out-of-context and legally protected ahistorical narrative upon new generations of children: it is because of a perceived never-ending Jewish, existentialist crisis. Read the whole article, from which these excerpts are taken, here: www.jns.org/yad-vashem-launches-academy-to-train-future-leaders-in-holocaust-awareness/
|
|
|
Post by blake121666 on Jan 15, 2022 21:02:43 GMT
Here is further evidence that the public’s understanding of the ‘h’-narrative is changing. The way in which the Holocaust narrative needs to change is from an understanding of the deaths as having been of an attritional nature (involving work camps and such) to that of the majority of the deaths as having been immediate - mass shootings and death camps. That is the main hangup in the public understanding of the Holocaust which leads some to deny the Holocaust. The public understanding of the Holocaust is muddied up by the work camp component of the Jewish experience during WWII - which gets conflated with the mass murder part of the Jewish experience during WWII. Hundreds of thousands of Jews had attritional deaths during the war but millions were directly and immediately murdered - by bullets and at death camps. For instance every time Tim Kelly brings up the Holocaust on his podcast, he and his cohost stupidly refer to "camps". Their understanding of the Jewish murders is occluded by this "camp" crap. They have in their minds some nonsense understanding that most Jews were sent to work camps or something. And that deaths at work camps were of more significance than they were in "the Holocaust narrative" as you call it. His narrative of the Holocaust in his mind is an ignorant and nonsensical narrative. Practically every American shares this ignorant narrative - the "revisionists" as well the ones who don't "question". Both sides blather on in their ignorant understandings about work camps.
|
|